In many commercial buildings, especially retrofit projects, achieving effective FCU control does not always require a full BMS system. In fact, installing a complete wired BMS can be overkill, costly, and disruptive. Understanding when BMS is necessary—or unnecessary—is key to maximizing ROI in energy retrofit projects.
● Integrate chillers, boilers, AHUs, pumps, and FCUs
● Enable centralized monitoring and system-level optimization
● Support complex control logic and alarm systems
Such architecture is ideal for new buildings or industrial-scale projects but often unnecessary for typical FCU retrofits.
● Basic temperature regulation
● Prevent tenants from overriding settings
● Runtime measurement for cost allocation
● Reduce non-business hour energy use
These objectives do not require high-speed buses or centralized controllers.
● High wiring and construction costs
● Tenant disruption
● Extended project timelines
● Complex commissioning and operation
● Each FCU operates independently
● Scheduling and temperature control are executed locally
● Network mainly for management and data upload
● No rewiring required
Reliability Advantages of Local Control
● FCU thermostats continue to operate if the network is offline
● Schedules and setpoints are preserved locally
● Only remote management and reporting are temporarily paused
● Deep integration with central chillers or boilers
● High-speed or complex control loops required
● New construction or full building renovations
But for FCU-focused energy retrofits, these conditions rarely apply.
The key is what is necessary, not what is more advanced. For most FCU retrofit projects, wireless, distributed control solutions offer faster deployment, measurable energy savings, and lower costs—without a full BMS system.
Access reliable LoRaWAN-based solutions for your commercial building.
